logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] oneway reverse patch

From Felix Hartmann extremecarver at gmail.com on Fri Apr 25 02:19:45 BST 2014

Yes I both add opposite oneway on the same road as well as only one oneway
or no oneway. It is highly important that the order is followed strictly
and continue vs continue with actions is strictly enacted in order. All
reversing should happen at the time its placed in the style. !!

Sometimes I reverse a way 3 times during processing. All I can say right
now its a bit of a mess
On Apr 25, 2014 2:24 AM, "Gerd Petermann" <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Felix,
>
> if your style interprets a tag like a oneway=yes you should add
> that tag. This might prevent problems caused by the RoadMerger,
> which might reverse lines which are not oneways.
> If you find or set oneway=-1, the current implementation
> will reverse the way.
> If you add multiple routable lines for one OSM
> way, one with, one without the oneway tag,
> you will see unpredictable directions if such a way
> is modified by the WrongAngleFixer and the type
> is direction dependent.
> The WrongAngleFixer assumes that the points in
> all ways with the same OSM id are equal, so
> it optimizes one way and copies the points to the others.
> This will fail if they have different oneway attributes.
> If you think this could be the cause of the problem,
> I should be able to provide a fix.
>
> Gerd
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 01:00:18 +0800
> From: extremecarver at gmail.com
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] oneway reverse patch
>
> Ups - but forgot to say. I think in 99% of all cases - cycleway:left and
> cycleway:right are used on streets which feature oneway=yes... less often
> oneway=-1 and even less often no oneway at all.
> Streets with oneway=yes are fine. I'm talking about no oneway tag from OSM
> data at all, or oneway=-1 set in style (but no oneway from OSM data) or no
> oneway at all. Only on those there are problems - so you're not likely to
> notice them I think....
>
>
> On 25 April 2014 00:39, Minko <ligfietser at online.nl> wrote:
>
> Yes I render cycleway:left and cycleway:right too.
> And as you say, they are always on the wrong side on the GPS.
> Interesting to know that Garmin uses asymmetric lines independent of the
> road direction. If we only could find out how they do this...
>
> Felix wrote
> > I don't think that Minkos style shows cycleways on the left/right side
> > of a road - am I wrong? - Anyhow they would usually have a oneway tag
> > already in OSM data.
> > Also definitely no uphill/downhill arrows - which nearly never
> > actually have a oneway tag (and only sometimes I add one during
> > processing).
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20140425/f4ddeb58/attachment.html>


More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list