[mkgmap-dev] --ignore-turn-restrictions

Sun May 17 21:52:24 BST 2009

okay, I was jolly sure it did. You were right however.
Now I'm standing in front of a much bigger problem. Rules placed in the 
style-file are not parsed in proper order!

See the example lines of my style-file. I expected that they were 
followed from top to bottom (I don't mind the order of objects read in 
the osm file, I do mind however that the style-file is parsed top to 
bottom, otherwise conditional rules will never work):
According to my style-file primary, secondary and tertiary roads should 
respect oneway rules. Other streets shouldn't. If I parse it like in the 
example, oneway streets are however more often than not also 
disrespected for all road types. Can you spot any problem why it's not 
working (I can easily identify all oneway streets because I in a second 
run I create a oneway street overlay with arrows pointing in the 
direction of the oneway - so I can't be mistaken on what is, and what is 
no oneway street)?

route=ferry 								[0x1a road_class=0 road_speed=0 resolution 18]

highway=motorway 		{set access=no} [0x29 resolution 16]
highway=motorway_link 		{set access=no}	[0x28 resolution 18]
highway=motorway_junction 	{set access=no}	[0x28 resolution 18]
highway=trunk 			{set access=no}	[0x28 resolution 18]
motorroad=yes 			{set access=no}	[0x28 resolution 18]
highway=trunk_link 		{set access=no}	[0x28 resolution 18]

highway=primary & ( route=mtb | route=bicycle )		[0x10 road_class=2 road_speed=4 resolution 18]
highway=primary & bicycle=no {set toll=yes}		[0x10 resolution 18]
highway=primary 					[0x10 road_class=0 road_speed=3 resolution 19]
highway=primary_link 					[0x10 road_class=0 road_speed=3 resolution 19]
highway=secondary 					[0x0d road_class=0 road_speed=3 resolution 19]
highway=tertiary 					[0x06 road_class=0 road_speed=3 resolution 20]

access=no | motorcar=no | access=destination | bicycle=yes | bicycle=designated| access=bicycle { set access=yes; set motorcar=yes }
( oneway=yes | oneway=1 | oneway=-1 ) {set oneway=no}

style file continues here with all other roads. I don't want oneway 
rules to be respected on them.

Mark Burton wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
>   
>> Currently this switch, disables oneway attributes too. Would it be 
>> possible to have several switches or change this to do what the name 
>> implies  or otherwise rename to -ignore-restrictions?
>> i.e. the most common:
>> ignore-oneway
>> ignore-turn-restrictions
>> ignore-access-restrictions
>> and as continuation of the current function ignore-restrictions to 
>> disable any kind of restriction (acces, turn, oneway, or other).
>>     
>
> Err, I don't think that it does disable the oneway attribute - take a
> look at the code and you will see that turn restrictions and oneway
> handling are completely separate.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20090517/5c5f4eb9/attachment.html 