logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] how to deal with "Attention: Tile contains both drive-on-left (303) and drive-on-right roads" ?

From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Thu Aug 1 17:30:51 BST 2019

Hi Ticker,

The problem with this kind of tagging is that it is not obvious for which way the access restriction is meant. In your example both ways have the same tags which allow bicycles, the default style interprets the barrier=kissing_gate as a bicycle=no.
No idea if the tagging makes sense for that particular place?

Gerd

________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. August 2019 18:15
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] how to deal with "Attention: Tile contains both drive-on-left (303) and drive-on-right roads" ?

Hi Gerd

Another case where I get similar errors is when there is a barrier that
imposes a restriction that is on the join of 2 ways (quite a common and
sensible thing to do):

WARN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.StyledConverter  74210002.osm.pbf:
Access restriction in POI node
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1043237463 affects routing on
multiple ways

Ticker

On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 12:29 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> Hi Alexis,
>
> turned out I was wrong. The messages which I referred to should
> contain the string "internal error". Your case was in fact simply
> wrong data.
> With r4288 the message was improved:
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=4288
>
> Gerd
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag
> von Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. August 2019 13:23
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] how to deal with "Attention: Tile contains
> both drive-on-left (303) and drive-on-right roads" ?
>
> Hi Alexis,
>
> thanks, that will help.
>
> Gerd
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag
> von Alexis Huxley <alexishuxley at gmail.com>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. August 2019 13:18
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] how to deal with "Attention: Tile contains
> both drive-on-left (303) and drive-on-right roads" ?
>
> Hi Gerd,
>
> Ticker wrote:
>
> > > I forgot to answer one of your previous questions fully:
> > > >        SEVERE (RestrictionRelation): /u/ahux/tmp-
> > > > dir/as/38610173.osm.pbf: Turn restriction (no_straight_on)
> > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9335098 (at
> > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=-6.405884&mlon=106.829270&zo
> > > > om=17)
> > > > via node is not a routing node
>
> Gerd wrote:
>
> > Whenever this message appears it means that there is a severe error
> > in
> > mkgmap.
> >
> > @Ticker: If you have sample data that allows to reproduce the
> > problem please
> > post a link.
>
> Geofabrik's daily 'asia-latest.osm.pbf' has this problem. I just re
> -downloaded
> from http://download.geofabrik.de/asia-latest.osm.pbf to verify the
> problem
> is still there, which it is. In case it helps, the checksum of the
> asia-latest.osm.pbf I just tested is:
>
>         $ md5sum download-cache-dir/asia-latest.osm.pbf
>         bae4ea71f6b48366cb21c2cdf5ceda20  download-cache-dir/asia
> -latest.osm.pbf
>         $
>
> Besides the numerous 'Tile contains both drive-on-left and drive-on
> -right'
> messages, which is what I originally posted about, and  which Ticker
> has
> already explained are not really errors, these are the other errors:
>
>         $ grep SEVERE *.log | grep -v 'Tile contains both drive-on
> -left'
>         SEVERE (RestrictionRelation): 59890171.osm.pbf: Turn
> restriction (only_straight_on)
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9335096 (at
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=-6.442483&mlon=106.830079&zoom=17)
> via node is not a routing node
>         SEVERE (MapFailedException): 59890543.osm.pbf: (thrown in
> RoadDef.writeRgnOffsets()) Overflow of the NET1. The tile
> (59890543.osm.pbf) must be split so that there are fewer roads in it
>         SEVERE (MapFailedException): 59890570.osm.pbf: (thrown in
> RoadDef.writeRgnOffsets()) Overflow of the NET1. The tile
> (59890570.osm.pbf) must be split so that there are fewer roads in it
>         $
>
> For the 'Overflow' ones, Ticker already advised me how to split the
> tiles
> up a bit more.
>
> Regading the 'Turn restriction', I've copied the specific tile
> 59890171.osm.pbf
> to https://datashare.rzg.mpg.de/s/RHEzSLYhNNkPbfb?path=%2Ftmp.
>
> My splitter and mkgmap command line arguments are:
>
>         java -Xmx380000M -jar splitter.jar --mapid=59890001 --search
> -limit=1000000 /u/ahux/tmp-dir/as/asia-latest.osm.pbf
>         java -Xmx380000M -jar mkgmap.jar --code-page=1252 --latin1 -
> -route --remove-short-arcs --add-pois-to-areas --index --location
> -autofill=is_in,nearest --tdbfile --mapname=59890001 --family-id=5989
> --family-name="OSM_AS" --overview-mapname=as --series-name="OSM Asia
> (2019 08)" --description="OSM_AS" --bounds=/u/ahux/tmp-dir/as/bounds
> -latest.zip --precomp-sea=/u/ahux/tmp-dir/as/sea-latest.zip --style
> -file=/u/ahux/tmp-dir/as/mkgmap/distrib/mkgmap
> -r4287/examples/styles/default -c template.args
>
> and I'm using:
>
>         $ ls -l ../../download-cache-dir/*.zip
>         -rw-r--r-- 2 ahux rzs 1090392991 Aug  1 10:36 ../../download
> -cache-dir/bounds-latest.zip
>         -rw-r--r-- 1 ahux rzs    3401612 Aug  1 11:45 ../../download
> -cache-dir/mkgmap-r4287.zip
>         -rw-r--r-- 2 ahux rzs  224903148 Aug  1 10:36 ../../download
> -cache-dir/sea-latest.zip
>         -rw-r--r-- 1 ahux rzs    1569564 Aug  1 11:45 ../../download
> -cache-dir/splitter-r592.zip
>         $
>
> Hope that helps you to help us! :-) Thanks!
>
> Alexis
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list