[mkgmap-dev] No address match for highway=pedestrian?

Fri Dec 11 14:14:48 GMT 2015

Are all highway=* & area=yes really ignored for routing? There are 
plenty of cases of highway=residential & area=yes and I think they 
should be routable.
I know way 109862652 should have a name tag (Plaza de los Bermejales as 
well) but if a way with the same name than addr:street already exists, 
shouldn't it be used for address search?

El 11/12/15 a las 09:41, Gerd Petermann escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I think the problem is that the way
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110145380
> is tagged with area=yes and therefore it is ignored for routing,
> means, it is not added as a road.
> Besides that highway=residential  way
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109862652
> is not tagged with name=*.
>
> Gerd
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila <cdavilam at orangecorreo.es>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2015 20:09
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] No address match for highway=pedestrian?
>
> I have found several cases where mkgmap complains no road is found for a
> given address but there's a pedestrian highway with the correct name
> next to the address nodes/ways. See for example:
> 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales
> 3(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2534468261
> 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales
> 3(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246230812
> 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales
> 6(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246232406
> 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales
> 7(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246232873
> 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales
> 9(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246233710
> and way 110145380