[mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways

Fri Oct 16 20:12:14 BST 2015

How about mkgmap:non-routable=yes ?

However, I don’t quite understand the reason behind the concept – surely if the road is under construction you can just set the type to be a non-routable one. If you are reusing a routable type, but telling the device not to allow routing down it, there will be scratched heads when you can’t route along a road that looks no different to any other.

Regards,

Mike

From: Alexandre Loss [mailto:alexandre.loss at gmail.com] 
Sent: 16 October 2015 19:47
To: Development list for mkgmap <mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways

I agree also that "mkgmap:ignore-for-routing=yes" is more clear.

2015-10-16 15:05 GMT-03:00 Gerd Petermann <GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com <mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> >:

Hi Ben,

thanks for the feedback. I also think that mkgmap:ignore-for-routing=yes is better.

Gerd

  _____  

Von: mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>  <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> > im Auftrag von Ben Konrath <ben at bagu.org <mailto:ben at bagu.org> >
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Oktober 2015 19:52
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways 

Hi Gerd,

Thanks for creating this patch. I ran a build with the patch and everything seemed work fine. I installed the map into BaseCamp without problems. I didn't specifically test a highway=construction way though.

As for the option name, using something like 'mkgmap:ignore-for-routing=yes' would be better because it makes the option easier to understand at a glance for people, such as myself, who don't know the nomenclature of the Garmin map format.

Thanks, Ben

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com <mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> > wrote:

sorry, forgot to mention that GPSMapEdit seems to have a problem with 
these roads. It shows the road as routable with more or less unpredictable
attributes. But Garmin software seems to work fine.

Gerd

  _____  

From: gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com <mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> 
To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> 
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:02:23 +0200
Subject: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways 

Hi all, 

attached patch implements the new internal tag 
mkgmap:add-to-NOD=false
to handle the issue discussed here:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/don-t-route-through-highway-construction-tt5856734.html

It shows how to use it in the default style.
I've also added a rule to ignore highway=planned like highway=proposed

If you don't like the rather technical name mkgmap:add-to-NOD, please let me know it,
here are my ideas for alternatives:
mkgmap:ignore-for-routing=yes
mkgmap:routable=no
mkgmap:address-search-only=yes

Gerd

_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>  http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> 
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> 
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20151016/5a250e9b/attachment.html>