logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] low-res-opt branch ready to merge?

From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Tue Jun 22 08:26:35 BST 2021

Hi all,

in r4785 I've renamed the options and tried to improve the docu, see https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=4785

Gerd

________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Felix Hartmann <extremecarver at gmail.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 21. Juni 2021 16:40
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] low-res-opt branch ready to merge?

Yes deprecate next year probably fine. Keeping the option name simple is best I think.

On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, 15:56 Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Felix,

I like --simplify-lines / --simplify-polygons.
What to do with the existing --reduce-... options? My plan is to introduce the new options and deprecate the old ones next year.

Gerd


________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> im Auftrag von Felix Hartmann <extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com>>
Gesendet: Montag, 21. Juni 2021 10:29
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] low-res-opt branch ready to merge?

if using reduce - then better call it --reduce-point-density-line and --reduce-point-density-polygon. Otherwise its a bit confusing. Or easiest - just call it --simplify-lines and --simplify-polygons (its not correcting an error, but just optimizing OSM data in my eyes. and how its achieved, dp-filter, whatever is not so relevant in the option name).
I do not know of any errors  good if it will be merged.


On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 11:20, Gerd Petermann <GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com><mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>>> wrote:
Hi all,

I made no more progress to find a solution to detect parallel lines in the overview map. Too many special cases and almost no improvement with the simple cases.
So, I think this should no longer block the merge to trunk.

Mike suggested not to add new options --simplify-filter-line-errors / --simplify-filter-polygon-errors but instead enhance the syntax for the existing options --reduce-point-density and --reduce-point-density-polygon. I am open to that. What's better?

Are there any other known problems with the branch? Any good ideas to improve something?

Gerd
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>
https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


--
Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list