[mkgmap-dev] Explanation of the is_in function

Mon May 18 08:07:42 BST 2020

Hi

When testing the IS_IN function I get very nice results ! Thank you very much for this improvement.
Could somebody help me to explain why a certain pedestrian is not catched by the rules?
Also not a big deal, I'm already happy wit the current results, it is just for understanding.
I am  using pedestrian streets without an outline if crossing pedestrian areas. 95% works perfectly but some seem to fool me.

Before
(The red lines are nicely replaced in the after situation, but the blue one is not)

highway = pedestrian & jbmsquare != true & is_in(highway,pedestrian, any) = true    [0x10d0c resolution 24 continue]

area: München Viktualienmarkt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/48.13504/11.57637
pedestrian :  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240014256
square: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7431621#map=19/48.13512/11.57670

[cid:image002.jpg at 01D62CF3.C553B200]

After
[cid:image005.jpg at 01D62CF3.C553B200]

Met vriendelijke groet,

Joris Bo
jorisbo at hotmail.com<mailto:jorisbo at hotmail.com>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20200518/f5b57a34/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 193823 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20200518/f5b57a34/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 157097 bytes
Desc: image005.jpg
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20200518/f5b57a34/attachment-0003.jpg>