[mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Wed Oct 23 11:00:26 BST 2019
Hi Ticker, fixed, see http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=4317 Working on some more code improvements now, so look for the latest binary for the branch at http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/download/mkgmap.html Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Oktober 2019 20:58 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD Hi Ticker, okay, I can reproduce the poor performance in this area. My timings: SCHW: uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.RoadNetwork 74210001.osm.pbf: routing island check took 5281 ms Total time taken: 35 seconds Most of the additional time is used to remove the nodes from NOD. This can be improved... Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk> Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Oktober 2019 19:24 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD Hi Gerd split.list contains: 74210001: 2362592,-73088 to 2376288,-50304 Note feed in a lot of points (postcodes) into the splitter, but there is nothing in the default style that will process them. splitter command line is: java -Xmx1540M -ea -jar ../splitter/splitter.jar --geonames -file=../cities15000.zip --mapid=74210001 --split-file=split.list ../mapGB/british-isles-latest.osm.pbf postcode.so.osm.xml >splitter.log 2>&1 # significant lines in ../mkgmap.opt max-jobs gmapsupp code-page=1252 index bounds=../bounds.zip location-autofill=is_in,nearest no-housenumbers name-tag-list=name:en,int_name,name,place_name,loc_name family-name=osm series-name=OpenStreetMap area-name=berkin x-mapset-name=OSM ticker route drive-on=detect,left preserve-element-order add-pois-to-areas generate-sea=multipolygon,extend-sea-sectors,close-gaps=350 link-pois-to-ways process-destination process-exits remove-ovm-work-files poi-address verbose order-by-decreasing-area add-boundary-nodes-at-admin-boundaries=0 Command line is: java -Xmx1540M -ea -Dlog.config=../mkgmap_log.props -jar ../mkgmap.noNod/mkgmap.jar -c ../mkgmap.opts --no-style-file --x-check -routing-island-len=700 --family-id=7421 --family-name=Hants -c template.args ../mytyp.txt I'm going to be out for the next few hours, but can do the log stuff later if you need it. Ticker On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 16:40 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi Ticker, > > please let me know the mkgmap options and the area for 74210001. > Maybe try with commented the log statements (except the one for the > timing ) > > Gerd > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Oktober 2019 18:33 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD > > Hi Gerd > > These are with default style. > > mkgmap-NET-no-NOD-r4304 --x-check-routing-island-len=700 > > SEVE: uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.RoadNetwork 74210002.osm.pbf: > check for routing islands found 38 islands > SEVE: uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.RoadNetwork 74210002.osm.pbf: > routing island check took 689 ms > SEVE: uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.RoadNetwork 74210001.osm.pbf: > check for routing islands found 554 islands > SEVE: uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.RoadNetwork 74210001.osm.pbf: > routing island check took 8279 ms > > Total time taken: 1 minute 12 seconds > > gmapsupp.img 15126528 bytes > Block size: 2048 > . 22016 > MAKEGMAP.MPS 138 > 00007421.MDR 728896 > 000MYTYP.TYP 1580 > 74210001.RGN 5870951 > 74210001.TRE 45927 > 74210001.LBL 624175 > 74210001.NET 1347117 > 74210001.NOD 2384384 > 74210002.RGN 2120704 > 74210002.TRE 17330 > 74210002.LBL 229542 > 74210002.NET 592062 > 74210002.NOD 1124864 > 00007421.SRT 912 > > With r4295: > > Total time taken: 1 minute 3 seconds > > gmapsupp.img 15943680 bytes > Block size: 2048 > . 23040 > MAKEGMAP.MPS 138 > 00007421.MDR 728896 > 000MYTYP.TYP 1580 > 74210001.RGN 5870951 > 74210001.TRE 45927 > 74210001.LBL 624175 > 74210001.NET 1354678 > 74210001.NOD 2975539 > 74210002.RGN 2120704 > 74210002.TRE 17330 > 74210002.LBL 229542 > 74210002.NET 593443 > 74210002.NOD 1343157 > 00007421.SRT 912 > > Ticker > > On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 16:02 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > > Hi Ticker, > > > > strange, in my tests the test for routing islands performed in < 50 > > ms. So, there seems to be a special case. > > Also, I did not see that big effect on img siz. > > Please can you test with default style for comparison? > > > > Gerd > > > > ________________________________________ > > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag > > von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk> > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Oktober 2019 17:51 > > An: Development list for mkgmap > > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD > > > > Hi Gerd > > > > Testing mkgmap-NET-no-NOD-r4304 with 2 tile local area with option > > --x-check-routing-island-len=700 > > > > Some build statistics: > > > > SEVE: uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.RoadNetwork 74210002.osm.pbf: > > check for routing islands found 293 islands > > SEVE: uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.RoadNetwork 74210002.osm.pbf: > > routing island check took 5252 ms > > SEVE: uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.RoadNetwork 74210001.osm.pbf: > > check for routing islands found 2820 islands > > SEVE: uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.RoadNetwork 74210001.osm.pbf: > > routing island check took 45755 ms > > > > Total time taken: 1 minute 53 seconds > > gmapsupp.img 13719552 bytes > > block size: 2048 > > . 20992 > > MAKEGMAP.MPS 138 > > 00007421.MDR 1121108 > > 000MYTYP.TYP 1580 > > 74210001.RGN 3802657 > > 74210001.TRE 17874 > > 74210001.LBL 758810 > > 74210001.NET 1536856 > > 74210001.NOD 2556416 > > 74210002.RGN 1645275 > > 74210002.TRE 8820 > > 74210002.LBL 268782 > > 74210002.NET 718899 > > 74210002.NOD 1241600 > > 00007421.SRT 912 > > > > For comparison, testing with r4295 (I get similar figures for > > trunk+): > > > > Total time taken: 1 minute 8 seconds > > gmapsupp.img 14710784 bytes > > Block size: 2048 > > . 22016 > > MAKEGMAP.MPS 138 > > 00007421.MDR 1121108 > > 000MYTYP.TYP 1580 > > 74210001.RGN 3802683 > > 74210001.TRE 17874 > > 74210001.LBL 758810 > > 74210001.NET 1562592 > > 74210001.NOD 3285327 > > 74210002.RGN 1645275 > > 74210002.TRE 8820 > > 74210002.LBL 268782 > > 74210002.NET 722291 > > 74210002.NOD 1477491 > > 00007421.SRT 912 > > > > So, for my test case, with my style, which probably creates quite a > > few > > more isolated networks than the default style: > > > > It adds quite a lot of processing time (increased by 66%) > > > > Reduces the NOD size significantly (22%) and full gmapsupp.img by > > 6%. > > > > It fixes a lot of "Route calculation errors" where the nearest road > > to > > the start/end point is an isolated network. However the behaviour > > of > > this changes in a way not apparent to the map user if what should > > have > > been an isolated network overlaps tiles. > > > > I vote for keeping something like this provided the routing-island > > detection only happens of the length option is specified (needs a > > better name than --x-check-routing-island-len) > > > > The unconnected road handling should be moved out of > > StyledConverter > > and handled as part of the length controlled general logic. > > > > Ticker > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mkgmap-dev mailing list > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > mkgmap-dev mailing list > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list