[mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD

Sat Oct 12 17:31:46 BST 2019

Hi Gerd

Sorry - I'd misunderstood the intention of change 2, but the new
version and its messages has clarified it for me.

Without --x-all-roads-to-nod, it does the stop the "Route Calculation
Errors" that I get with the trunk version when trying to navigate
to/from an unconnected road.

GMAPSUPP.IMG is about 5% smaller.

Do you attempt to isolate small road networks that are not connected to
the rest of the system or just a single road?

I've not yet tried the new version with --all-roads-to-nod. I'm going
to use it without for the next few days and see how it behaves.

Ticker

On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 15:33 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> Hi Ticker,
> 
> I just committed r4302, please try with that.
> 
> Gerd
> 
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag
> von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk>
> Gesendet: Samstag, 12. Oktober 2019 17:07
> An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD
> 
> Hi Gerd
> 
> I'm just starting to test this, but looking through the log lines (I
> get 1260 of them for 2 tiles) like:
> 
> SEVE: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.StyledConverter 
>  74210001.osm.pbf:
> check: road without connection is not written to NOD Newport to Cowes
> cycleway (OSM id 562475661) 50.749482,-1.294847
> 
> there are some, eg the above, that I don't expect to see as it is
> joined at both ends. I'll continue to investigate and I'm loading
> onto
> my device to test.
> 
> Ticker
> 
> On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 10:17 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I've tried to work out under what conditions we need routing nodes
> > when using OSM input (not polish *mp):
> > See
> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=430
> > 0
> > for details.
> > 
> > Please try the new version with a few tiles (maybe 4).
> > The version r4301 produces some messages like
> > SCHWERWIEGEND (StyledConverter): d:\mkgmap\test\resources\in\osm\uk
> > -test-1.osm.gz: check: road without connection is not written to
> > NOD
> > Wildwood Rise (OSM id 4013934) 51.570805,-0.178385
> > SCHWERWIEGEND (StyledConverter): f:\osm\wildeshausen.o5m: check:
> > road
> > without connection is not written to NOD (OSM id 243082453)
> > 52.903136,8.414926
> > 
> > These are not errors, they just help to find the places where the
> > result of the branch version is (very) different.
> > 
> > Please compare a map produced with the trunk version (r4299) with a
> > new map produced with the branch version and check address search
> > and
> > routing at some places printed with these error messages.
> > Please try also new experimental option --x-all-roads-to-nod . If
> > given, mkgmap will add at least one routing node to each routable
> > line so that it is added to NOD.
> > 
> > I hope the program is stable, so you should not see crashes, else
> > please let me know details.
> > Pleaase let me know which result you prefer.
> > 1) trunk r4299
> > 2) branch r4301 WITHOUT option --x-all-roads-to-nod
> > 3) branch r4301 WITH option --x-all-roads-to-nod
> > 
> >  1) should give the largest file, 2) the smallest,  3) between
> > 
> > Gerd
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev