[mkgmap-dev] Find Address - No cities

Thu Aug 3 06:15:31 BST 2017

Hi Ticker,

sounds good, but I cannot compile:
ant clean test
gives
build-test:
    [mkdir] Created dir: D:\mkgmap\build\test
    [javac] Compiling 73 source files to D:\mkgmap\build\test
    [javac] D:\mkgmap\test\func\lib\ArrayImgWriter.java:26: error: ArrayImgWriter is not abstract and does not override abstract method putN(int,int) in ImgFileWriter
    [javac] public class ArrayImgWriter implements ImgFileWriter {
    [javac]        ^
    [javac] 1 error

ciao,
Gerd
________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 1. August 2017 14:31:57
An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Find Address - No cities

Hi Gerd

I decided to both fix the code and put out a warning message if there
are structures that switch to 3 byte pointers (zips, highways and exit
facilities as well as cities)

Address search now works when there are > 65535 cities.

The code is a lot tidier - I've done it properly and it gets rid of
lots of messy bits of in-line testing against sizes > 255 etc.

Ticker

On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 13:12 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> Hi Tcker,
>
> yes, good enough. I also thought about this alternative.
>
> Gerd
>
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag
> von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk>
> Gesendet: Montag, 31. Juli 2017 13:09:49
> An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Find Address - No cities
>
> Hi Gerd
>
> I started fixing all the places where there is an assumption about
> the
> number of cities (and zips) being < 65535 and I'm only part way
> through
> my list of suspect files and have make a lot of changes so far.
>
> I'm thinking it is not worth while because:
>
> The overall MDR size jumps because all city entries change to 3
> bytes.
> I get a smaller GMAPSUPP by increasing the splitting so that it stays
> in the 2 byte limit.
>
> I might miss some subtle coding of the header flags and/or the
> input/output.
>
> It might not work anyway after I've made all the changes.
>
> The changes are a bit messy because I've just hacked each problem
> area
> with a fix. Really there should be some utility functions,
> enhancements
> to the readers/writers and pointerSize variables in the relevant
> classes.
>
> I propose just to signal an error in individual maps when the exceed
> the limit
>
> What do you think?
>
> Regards
> Ticker
>
> On Sun, 2017-07-30 at 10:16 +0100, Ticker Berkin wrote:
> > Hi Gerd
> >
> > I'll just done a bit more investigation and see what seems to be
> > the
> > the same assumption in imgfmt/app/net/RoadDef.java around line 296
> >                                         if(numCities > 255)
> >
> >  writer.putChar(cityIndex);
> >                                         else
> >
> >  writer.put((byte)cityIndex);
> >
> > I'll fix and test tomorrow and if there are still have problems
> > I'll
> > assemble the problem map, style etc for you
> >
> > Thanks
> > Ticker
> >
> > On Sun, 2017-07-30 at 06:33 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> > > Hi Ticker,
> > >
> > > hmm, I think the patch looks good and I have no idea why the
> > > search
> > > doesn't work
> > > for you. Yesterday I thought the patch handles the overall number
> > > of
> > > cities in the gmapsupp,
> > > but it is about the number of cities in a single map tile.
> > > Maybe there is another problem caused by the high number of
> > > cities.
> > > Maybe you can post a link to the tile with
> > > that high number?
> > >
> > > Gerd
> > >
> > > ________________________________________
> > > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im
> > > Auftrag
> > > von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk>
> > > Gesendet: Samstag, 29. Juli 2017 21:12:27
> > > An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Find Address - No cities
> > >
> > > Hi Gerd
> > >
> > > Quite possibly, or maybe there are limits in the device.
> > >
> > > More testing reveals that although my lists of cities and streets
> > > within them appear correctly in Find>Address, it doesn't find
> > > anything.
> > >
> > > Ticker
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 17:22 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> > > > Hi Tcker,
> > > >
> > > > thanks for the patch. I seem to remember that the number of
> > > > entries
> > > > in mdr5 is also used
> > > > elsewhere. Will have a closer look tomorrow.
> > > >
> > > > Gerd
> > > > ________________________________________
> > > > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im
> > > > Auftrag
> > > > von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk>
> > > > Gesendet: Samstag, 29. Juli 2017 19:14:02
> > > > An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Find Address - No cities
> > > >
> > > > Hi Gerd
> > > >
> > > > It looks as if can simply write 1/2/3 bytes as have indicated
> > > > in
> > > > the
> > > > magic field in the MDR header and I've changed it to do this.
> > > > All
> > > > seems
> > > > OK.
> > > >
> > > > Yes - I do misuse a City POI. But now, after having worked out
> > > > how
> > > > the
> > > > MDR20 index works, I might be able to do what I want in a
> > > > better
> > > > way.
> > > >
> > > > Attached is patch to write the correct number of bytes.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Ticker
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 16:37 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> > > > > Hi Ticker,
> > > > >
> > > > > yes, sounds plausible. The comment seems to say that we don't
> > > > > know
> > > > > how to handle so many cities.
> > > > > Why do you have so many cities. Do you "abuse" the
> > > > > corresponding
> > > > > POI
> > > > > for something?
> > > > >
> > > > > Gerd
> > > > > ________________________________________
> > > > > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im
> > > > > Auftrag
> > > > > von Ticker Berkin <ticker at jagIT.co.uk>
> > > > > Gesendet: Samstag, 29. Juli 2017 18:13:20
> > > > > An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > > > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Find Address - No cities
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Gerd
> > > > >
> > > > > I think I've found the problem:
> > > > >
> > > > > /src/uk/me/parabola/imgfmt/app/mdr/Mdr5.java line 227
> > > > >
> > > > >         private void putLocalCityIndex(ImgFileWriter writer,
> > > > > int
> > > > > cityIndex) {
> > > > >                 if (localCitySize == 2)
> > > > >                 // 3 probably not possible in actual maps.
> > > > >                         writer.putChar((char) cityIndex);
> > > > >                 else
> > > > >                         writer.put((byte) cityIndex);
> > > > >         }
> > > > >
> > > > > There were more than 63335 cities in the failing map.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ticker
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 16:09 +0100, Ticker Berkin wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Gerd
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've done a bit of investigation and debugging. It seems to
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > building
> > > > > > the indexes with enough cities and streets. MDR20 is the
> > > > > > suspect
> > > > > > index.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm now experimenting with mkgmap / Display
> > > > > >
> > > > > > With just the suspect map built in gmapsupp:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $ ... test.ExtractFile gmapsupp.img
> > > > > > filter[]
> > > > > > Copying .               65024
> > > > > > Copying MAKEGMAP.MPS    78
> > > > > > Copying 74440044.RGN    4154927
> > > > > > Copying 74440044.TRE    18772
> > > > > > Copying 74440044.LBL    2174485
> > > > > > Copying 74440044.NET    1626350
> > > > > > Copying 74440044.NOD    3566829
> > > > > > Copying 00007444.MDR    2979295
> > > > > > Copying 00007444.SRT    912
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $ ... test.display.MdrSummary 00007444.MDR
> > > > > > initial values    7    2    e
> > > > > > MDR 1  NR=1     (000001) RS=4  magic=0x0
> > > > > > MDR 4  NR=101   (000065) RS=3  magic=0x0
> > > > > > MDR 5  NR=54456 (00d4b8) RS=9  magic=0x152
> > > > > > MDR 6  NR=4039  (000fc7) RS=3  magic=0x1
> > > > > > MDR 7  NR=17674 (00450a) RS=6  magic=0x66
> > > > > > MDR 9  NR=11    (00000b) RS=4  magic=0x0
> > > > > > MDR 10 DataSize=427616   (00068660) magic=0x0
> > > > > > MDR 11 NR=106904(01a198) RS=10 magic=0x95
> > > > > > MDR 12 NR=11    (00000b) RS=7  magic=0x40a
> > > > > > MDR 17 DataSize=111036   (0001b1bc) magic=0x0
> > > > > > MDR 18 NR=102   (000066) RS=5  magic=0x6
> > > > > > MDR 19 NR=106904(01a198) RS=3  magic=0x2
> > > > > > MDR 20 NR=20389 (004fa5) RS=6  magic=0xe
> > > > > > MDR 22 NR=18117 (0046c5) RS=6  magic=0xc000e
> > > > > > MDR 24 NR=2     (000002) RS=6  magic=0x0
> > > > > > MDR 25 NR=70016 (011180) RS=3  magic=0x0
> > > > > > MDR 29 NR=2     (000002) RS=8  magic=0x26
> > > > > >
> > > > > > seems fine but
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $ ... test.display.MdrCheck 00007444.MDR
> > > > > > ---------- 00007444.MDR --------------------
> > > > > > EXTRA
> > > > > > remaining {}
> > > > > > # reading 74440044
> > > > > > mdr5 check
> > > > > > Exception in thread "main"
> > > > > > java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException:
> > > > > > Index:
> > > > > > 308736, Size: 70018
> > > > > >         at
> > > > > > java.util.ArrayList.rangeCheck(ArrayList.java:653)
> > > > > >         at java.util.ArrayList.get(ArrayList.java:429)
> > > > > >         at
> > > > > > test.display.check.MapDetails.getCity(MapDetails.java:188)
> > > > > >         at test.display.MdrCheck.check5(MdrCheck.java:282)
> > > > > >         at test.display.MdrCheck.print(MdrCheck.java:87)
> > > > > >         at
> > > > > > test.display.CommonDisplay.display(CommonDisplay.java:171)
> > > > > >         at
> > > > > > test.display.CommonDisplay.display(CommonDisplay.java:196)
> > > > > >         at
> > > > > > test.check.CommonCheck.runMain(CommonCheck.java:145)
> > > > > >         at test.display.MdrCheck.main(MdrCheck.java:1789)
> > > > > > + exit
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On another map from the split this runs OK, producing
> > > > > > masses
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > output:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $ ... test.display.MdrCheck 00007429.MDR
> > > > > > ---------- 00007429.MDR --------------------
> > > > > > EXTRA
> > > > > > remaining {}
> > > > > > # reading 74290047
> > > > > > ERROR: map 1: city 1: no name; index 1
> > > > > > mdr5 check
> > > > > > 1 map1; ABBEY WOOD mapCity=2 reg=0 (LONDON) country=0
> > > > > > (UNITED
> > > > > > KINGDOM^]GBR) ind20=0 rep=false
> > > > > > 2 map1; ABRIDGE mapCity=3 reg=0 (ESSEX) country=0 (UNITED
> > > > > > KINGDOM^]GBR)
> > > > > > ind20=0 rep=false
> > > > > > ... 87000 more lines ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you think mkgmap:Display is finding a real problem and I
> > > > > > should
> > > > > > pursue this line, or could it be unreliable and this
> > > > > > exception
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > due
> > > > > > to it rather than the format of the index?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > Ticker
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 23:42 -0700, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> > > > > > > Ticker Berkin wrote
> > > > > > > > With a particular split of 'british-isles', one map
> > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > split
> > > > > > > > causes the list of cities in the Find>Address function
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > empty.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Maybe you have the same problem here which I described
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > road
> > > > > > > name search when road names contain special characters.
> > > > > > > In
> > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > case
> > > > > > > this would mean special characters in the citiy names.
> > > > > > > I suggest to add debug code in
> > > > > > > uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.mdr.Mdr5.writeSectData(ImgFileW
> > > > > > > ri
> > > > > > > te
> > > > > > > r
> > > > > > > writer)
> > > > > > > to print all city names which are written to the global
> > > > > > > index.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Gerd
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > > > > http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Find-Add
> > > > > > > ress-No-cities-tp5899775p5899880.html
> > > > > > > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
> > > > > > > Nabble.com.
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > > > > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > > > > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > > > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > > > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev