[mkgmap-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved?

Wed Feb 1 09:56:37 GMT 2017

The problem is that it works too well. Paved roads with some potholes which are marked as bad are avoided.

On the forum there is support for skipping smoothness=bad from the list of unpaved options, but to add a road_speed penalty instead.

I think of adding this rule after the unpaved rules

highway=* & mkgmap:unpaved=0 & smoothness ~ '.*(bad|horrible|impassable)'  { add mkgmap:road-speed = '-2' }

________________________________
Van: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> namens Gerd Petermann <GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>
Verzonden: maandag 30 januari 2017 03:10:15
Aan: Development list for mkgmap
Onderwerp: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved?

I did not try if the rule itself works. If it catches "bad", "very_bad", and all worser values I think it is good as it is.

Gerd

________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von lig fietser <ligfietser at hotmail.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 30. Januar 2017 10:07:07
An: mkgmap-dev
Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved?

Hi list,

On the Garmin OSM forum there is a discussion started whether we should consider smoothness=bad as unpaved. In the default rules it is treated as unpaved. What do you think?

Should we adapt the rules and skip 'bad' from the unpaved list?

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628555#p628555

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20170201/baeb77d7/attachment-0001.html>