[mkgmap-dev] motorvehicle=delivery seems to be ignored ?

Sun Feb 14 12:51:49 GMT 2016

>From an English-speaking standpoint I would associate delivery (in the
context of "no entry except for delivery" for example) with the purpose
of your visit (i.e. to deliver something) but not specific to a
particular sort of vehicle, and not in itself related to the possession
of individual permission.

I would suggest mapping access=delivery to access=destination, i.e. no
access unless you actually need to be there. I think that's about as
close as you can get within the Garmin access model. 

--colin 

On 2016-02-14 13:38, Gerd Petermann wrote:

> If I got that right, the rules in inc/access should be changed so that 
> 
> access=delivery (or variants like motorvehicle/ hgv/ motorcar etc ) is treated similar to goods=yes ? 
> 
> Does anybody have working rules for this tag ? 
> 
> Gerd 
> 
> -------------------------
> 
> VON: mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd Petermann <GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>
> GESENDET: Sonntag, 14. Februar 2016 08:28
> AN: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> BETREFF: [mkgmap-dev] motorvehicle=delivery seems to be ignored ? 
> 
> Hi all, 
> 
> I found this thread on the talk list: 
> 
> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Routing-through-access-delivery-tt5867583.html 
> 
> I am about to answer there and a post a link to this forum.  
> 
> Gerd 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20160214/cb0c7c66/attachment.html>