[mkgmap-dev] strange routing
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Fri May 2 14:10:56 BST 2014
Hi Felix, yes, that's my concern as well. Maybe the active routing changed something? I'll try to create a small test. I am pretty sure that extended types are not allowed for routing. Also, routable maps from Garmin don't seem to use any type for roads which we call non-routable. Gerd Felix Hartmann-2 wrote > Well, I think using nonroutable lines for routable types broke the > address search (you tried to get somewhere that didn't exist for routing > or so...). But I'm not sure what it was about exactly. I think it broke > something because I remember I used 0x00 and 0x01 unroutable long time > ago and stopped using it.. > > On the other hand, if 0x15 is routable without problems now, could this > be true for all types? - Assuming the nonroutable types are actually > routable, just mkgmap cannot create them routable??? > On 02.05.2014 14:59, Gerd Petermann wrote: >> Hi Felix, >> >> on the other hand, the test that prints the messages below may also be >> out-dated. >> I am no longer sure that the use of routable types for non-routable >> lines really breaks >> routing. I'll have to search the archives to find out why I've coded >> that test. >> >> Gerd >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 14:56:10 +0200 >> From: > extremecarver@ >> To: > mkgmap-dev at .org >> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] strange routing >> >> I know that a long time ago I tried 0x15 - and it would not route on >> my Vista HCx - but mind - that's a long time ago. Never tried id since... >> On 02.05.2014 14:54, Gerd Petermann wrote: >> >> Hi Minko, >> >> yes, MapSource uses type 0x15 for routing. >> When I add it to the list of routable types --check-styles >> complains about other lines in your style: >> Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with >> level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 296 >> Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with >> level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 297 >> Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with >> level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 298 >> Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with >> level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 299 >> Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with >> level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 341 >> Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with >> level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 342 >> Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with >> level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 345 >> >> So I am not sure if I should simply commit that. >> Does anybody else use type 0x15 for lines? >> >> Gerd >> >> >> >> >> > Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 13:12:15 +0200 >> > From: > ligfietser@ > <mailto: > ligfietser@ > > >> > To: > mkgmap-dev at .org >> <mailto: > mkgmap-dev at .org > > >> > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] strange routing >> > >> > Hi Gerd >> > Yes, seems 0x15 is routable. >> > >> > >> > > forgot to mention that --check-styles complains about line 266 >> in the >> > > lines file: >> > > highway=bridleway & bicycle!=yes & bicycle!=designated & >> > > bicycleroute!=yes & mtb_from_relation!=yes & mtb!=yes {add >> access = >> > > no; add foot = yes; set mkgmap:unpaved=1} [0x2915 road_class=0 >> > > road_speed=0 resolution 23] >> > > >> > > Type 0x2915 is in the overlays file : >> > > 0x2915: 0x15, 0x29 >> > > >> > > Do you think type 0x15 is routable? >> > > >> > > Gerd >> > _______________________________________________ >> > mkgmap-dev mailing list >> > > mkgmap-dev at .org >> <mailto: > mkgmap-dev at .org > > >> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> > mkgmap-dev at .org > <mailto: > mkgmap-dev at .org > > >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >> >> >> -- >> keep on biking and discovering new trails >> >> Felix >> openmtbmap.org &www.velomap.org <http://www.velomap.org> >> >> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing >> list > mkgmap-dev at .org > >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> > mkgmap-dev at .org >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > -- > keep on biking and discovering new trails > > Felix > openmtbmap.org & www.velomap.org > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at .org > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/strange-routing-tp5804835p5804925.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] strange routing
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] strange routing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list