[mkgmap-dev] Commit: r2982: performance improvement: use Path2D.append() followed by one

Mon Jan 27 07:37:09 GMT 2014

Hi WanMil,

I was not yet able to change the PrecompSea* code so that it generates
identical output in two runs, so I still can't say for sure 
that the differences in the output can be ignored :-(

Maybe you have an idea?

Gerd

GerdP wrote
> Good hint :-)
> I'll try that tomorrow.
> 
> Gerd
> 
>> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:03:05 +0100
>> From: 

> wmgcnfg@

>> To: 

> mkgmap-dev at .org

>> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r2982: performance improvement: use
>> Path2D.append() followed by one
>> 
>> >  > P.S.: I noticed that the sea files have a slightly different size
>> with
>> >  > r2981 and r2982. I guess that's because of different id's used for
>> nodes
>> >  > and ways?
>> > yes, I noticed that, too, but found no difference in the data in JOSM.
>> > Maybe I write a tool to renumber the nodes and ways and order them
>> somehow
>> > so that it is easier to compare.
>> >
>> > Gerd
>> >
>> 
>> Running with one thread should give the same results? That might be 
>> easier that writing a separate tool.
>> WanMil
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> 

> mkgmap-dev at .org

>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>  		 	   		  
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list

> mkgmap-dev at .org

> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Commit-r2982-performance-improvement-use-Path2D-append-followed-by-one-tp5794237p5794437.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.