logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH] RoadMerger reverses roads

From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Thu Jan 9 16:46:29 GMT 2014

Hi WanMil,

the patch has an influence on the number of turn restrictions. 
For a tile in northern Germany GPSMapEdit shows :
r2946 with --x-no-mergeroads: 264 (valid) turn restirictions, 22 invalid 
r2946 with activated mergeroads : 264 (valid) turn restirictions, 22 invalid 
r2946 with patch and --x-no-mergeroads: 264 (valid) turn restirictions, 22 invalid 
r2946 with patch and activated mergeroads : 223 (valid) turn restirictions, 25 invalid 

(The invalid turn restrictions are listed in the log. Those are the ones that prohibit
to drive into the wrong end of a oneway road, but GPSMapEdit doesn't care when
the turn restriction also forbids to walk into the road)

Do you think that this could be okay?


Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 22:55:43 +0100
From: wmgcnfg at web.de
To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Subject: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH] RoadMerger reverses roads

Attached patch improves the RoadMerger so that roads are reversed when 
it is required to be merged with another road.
A small test increased the mergerate by 2% (avg. 17% => 19% road network 
Please check it. The p-road check is not yet implemented.
There are also some performance improvements possible which I will post 
with the next patch version.
Unit tests may fail.
> Hi Gerd,
>> Hi WanMil,
>> two points:
>> 1) line 517 is obsolete:
>> mergePoints.add(end);
>> It just blows up the size of the list and processing time.
> Yep.
> I've found another important thing: the road merger can merge many more
> ways when it reverses non oneway ways. This should be no problem so
> let's do it :-)
> I will post another patch.

mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20140109/e63121ba/attachment.html>

More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list