[mkgmap-dev] boundary relations in splitter

From Minko ligfietser at online.nl on Tue Feb 12 08:28:30 GMT 2013

Hi Gerd,

Why is option 1 too simple? Most important is that it is effective and customizable.
I would go for 1a, add an include list and I can add my own options, like national_park and protected_area.
Maybe a good idea to exclude mp boundaries too. 

---

• Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] boundary relations in splitter
• Next message: [mkgmap-dev] boundary relations in splitter
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list