[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH] Again NullPointerException

Sat Feb 11 16:18:59 GMT 2012

Hi Thorsten,

I think something must be wrong. I would not expect a change in file sizes and I did not 
see one in my test data.
The patch verify_boundary_v3.patch doesn't remove any data, so I assume that
you have applied one of the older patches.
Can you please verify that ?
The correct patch contains a line with
Collections.reverse(coords); 

Gerd

> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:49:59 +0100
> From: kukuk at suse.de
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH] Again NullPointerException
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 09, GerdP wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > as a result of previous discussions here is th new patch.
> > 
> > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5471749/verify_boundary_v3.patch
> > verify_boundary_v3.patch 
> 
> With mkgmap-r2205, with and without this patch, I get an expecption
> on the planet data from 2012-02-10:
> 
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.AssertionError
>         at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryUtil.loadBoundaryFile(BoundaryUtil.java:145)
> 
> If I disable the assert, mkgmap-r2205 finishes building boundarys
> without problems.
> 
> There is only one big difference in the boundary data:
> The boundary data created by mkgmap with this patch is 15% smaller
> than the one created without this patch.
> 
> I don't know how to compare best which data is missing, but I think
> 15% is a lot. Or is this expected?
> 
>   Thorsten
> 
> -- 
> Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg
> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20120211/76924a85/attachment.html 