[mkgmap-dev] Question reg. precompiled bounds

Tue Jan 24 21:26:01 GMT 2012

Hi WanMil,

okay, I agree that we might need the data. What do you think about removing it when it lies in a 
boundary that has the same postal_code?

Gerd

> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:22:19 +0100
> From: wmgcnfg at web.de
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Question reg. precompiled bounds
> 
> Hi Gerd,
> 
> it depends on how exact you want to be.
> In most cases you won't require building with a postal_code tag. But if 
> the building contains a POI without a postal_code you might need it.
> I know this example is a bit too meticulous but it shows the general 
> problem we have unless there is a commonly used tagging for postal_code 
> areas.
> 
> WanMil
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > some of the precompiled bounds contain quite a lot of buildings with a
> > postal_code tag, e.g.
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/25587396
> > or
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/60792963
> >
> > Is this info really needed in the location hook? It seems to slow down the
> > creation of the quadtree.
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Gerd
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Question-reg-precompiled-bounds-tp7217885p7217885.html
> > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > _______________________________________________
> > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20120124/3a25f5f5/attachment.html 