[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] grok unpavedness

Mon Dec 7 22:14:45 GMT 2009

On 07.12.2009 22:36, Mark Burton wrote:
> Bloody typical, you wait around for ages hoping for a new routing
> capability to be added to mkgmap and then two come along on
> the same day.
>
> I've been trying to discover how unpavedness is encoded for at least 6
> months. Every now and again, I return to think about it some more.
> Check and re-check the same old data structures. Very
> frustrating, no progress. Damn those cunning bastards at Garmin....
>
> However, a month or two ago, I discovered that Table C contains more
> than just turn restrictions. I still don't know many of it's little
> secrets but, today, having exhausted all other possibilities, I finally
> twigged that Table C contains the key to understanding "unpavedness".
> Gotcha!
>
> The attached patch allows you to add either unpaved=yes/true/1 or
> paved=no/false/0 to a way and then it will be ignored for routing
> purposes when the GPS has been told to avoid unpaved roads.
>
> Not sure if those are the best tags to use - any thoughts?
>
> BTW - the unpaved road line type 0x0a has nothing to do with
> unpavedness, it's just a routable way that gets drawn as a dashed line
> (default rendering).
>
> Feedback, etc.
>
> Mark
>    
I have problems compiling with that patch:

compile:
     [javac] Compiling 317 source files to 
d:\Garmin\mkgmap_svn_trunk3\build\classes
     [javac] 
d:\Garmin\mkgmap_svn_trunk3\src\uk\me\parabola\mkgmap\osmstyle\StyledConverter.java:1418: 
illegal start of expression
     [javac]             if(way.isBoolTag("unpaved") || 
way.isNotBoolTag("paved")))
     
[javac]                                                                      
^
     [javac] 1 error

Will try again against a clean trunk but I am not using many patches 
currently (basicly only the blacklist/whitelist patch plus some simple 
value changes that should not affect anything).
BTW I think the blacklist / whitelist tag file patch would be good to 
include as no-one noticed anything broken (I don't need it and just used 
it for testing - but I think it can be useful for some mapmakers).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20091207/b691dde9/attachment.html