[mkgmap-dev] mkgmap rules tiny break

Sun Aug 30 22:20:55 BST 2009


Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
> Hi
>
>   
>> oh so my logic was wrong. I would have thought that the above would not
>> show in case both mtb AND bicycle route is set, and not OR.
>> So how would I do that, a rule that needs all three to be true like
>> this: ( tunnel=yes & route!=mtb & route!= bicycle ) [....] ?
>>     
>
> Yes, that would be true for tunnel=yes and route=abc, but not when
> route=mtb or route=bicycle, if that is what you wanted to do.
> The parentheses are not needed.
>
>    tunnel = yes & route!=mtb & route!=bicycle
>
> is the same as:
>
>    tunnel = yes & !(route = mtb | route = bicycle)
>   
Ay Caramba. that's looking good.
> which might be a clearer way to write it.  This is supposed to
> be supported but was never completely implemented. I have
> a fix for that which I will commit in the next few minutes.
>
> ..Steve
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20090830/e9a8d50d/attachment.html