<div dir="ltr"><div>Those mappers might have used this new proposal for highway=junction incorrectly. <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway%3Djunction" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway%3Djunction</a></div><div><br></div><div>I'm not sure about their motives or reasoning but clearly a changeset comment or an email to those people is in order. <br></div><div><br></div><div>Dave<br></div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 12:02 AM Gerd Petermann <<a href="mailto:gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com" target="_blank">gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Yes, look like mapping errors (mapping for the renderer?). Maybe area:highway=* was meant. I would not change the style for them.<br>
<br>
Gerd<br>
<br>
________________________________________<br>
Von: mkgmap-dev <<a href="mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk" target="_blank">mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk</a>> im Auftrag von ael <<a href="mailto:witwall3@disroot.org" target="_blank">witwall3@disroot.org</a>><br>
Gesendet: Samstag, 12. September 2020 18:52<br>
An: Development list for mkgmap<br>
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=unclassified & area=yes<br>
<br>
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 05:27:03PM +0100, Ticker Berkin wrote:<br>
> Hi all<br>
><br>
> Diagnosing what seemed like superfluous navigation pop-up, eg "Turn<br>
> left on A1", while driving on the A1, I discover quite a few junctions<br>
> are surrounded by a closed way with tags [highway=unclassified,<br>
> area=yes]<br>
><br>
> <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239371846" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239371846</a><br>
> <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239371836" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239371836</a><br>
> <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239754207" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239754207</a><br>
><br>
> I haven't found any references to this being something that is<br>
> acceptable or is wrong, so I don't know if these should be deleted from<br>
> OSM and/or ignored by the mkgmap style.<br>
<br>
They look clearly wrong to me, but then I don't have any local<br>
knowledge.<br>
<br>
ael<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mkgmap-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk" target="_blank">mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk</a><br>
<a href="http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mkgmap-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk" target="_blank">mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk</a><br>
<a href="http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Dave Swarthout<br>Homer, Alaska<br>Chiang Mai, Thailand<br>Travel Blog at <a href="http://dswarthout.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://dswarthout.blogspot.com</a></div></div>