<!DOCTYPE html>
<html><head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head><body><p>Hi,</p><p>from me a very big Thank You to all, who work at DEM ,too!</p><p>1 Questions:</p><p>The Oregon shows no schaded relief, when it used in the night-mode. Is that OK?</p><p>Greets</p><p>Arndt</p><p><br></p><blockquote type="cite">Gerd Petermann hat am 28. Dezember 2017 um 11:01 geschrieben:<br><br><br>Hi all,<br><br>see the log message <a href="http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=4022" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=4022</a> <br>for details about the changes.<br><br>I've also experimented with code to read a *.poly file and use that to define an area for which mkgmap should <br>not calculate DEM data but was not happy with the results so far. Maybe I'll try again.<br><br>Henning has pointed me to an error:<br>It seems that mkgmap (and probably also BuildDEMFile) somtimes create invalid DEM data <br>for areas where the hgt files contain large holes, esp. when resolution is low (high dem-dist value).<br>See e.g. <a href="http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/377/holes.jpg" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/377/holes.jpg</a><br>I try to find out more now.<br><br><br>Gerd<br>_______________________________________________<br>mkgmap-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap">mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap</a>.org.uk<br><a href="http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev</a></blockquote></body></html>