<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Hi Nelson,<br><br>there is no special java code in mkgmap to treat aeroways.<br>I guess you don't use the default style, so I can't say what goes wrong.<br>A good tool to find out what mkgmap writes to the img file is<br>GPSMapEdit.<br>Use it to open the corresponding img file and double click into the area<br>you want to analyse. It shows you what Garmin type the area has.<br>Press escape to close the dialog box followed by<br>delete to remove that polygon. Repeat this process until GPSMapEdit <br>shows something like<br>"Area of map coverage (0x4b, polygon)"<br><br>If you do this for both img files (the good and the bad one) you<br>should be able to find out what's different.<br><br>Gerd<br><br><br><div>> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 23:45:05 -0300<br>> From: naoliv@gmail.com<br>> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<br>> Subject: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation<br>> <br>> Could somehow mkgmap have an issue with aeroway=aerodrome as a<br>> relation? (instead a simple closed way)<br>> <br>> For example, this airport http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90834745<br>> have its internal grasses properly represented like here:<br>> http://cocardl.com.br/pv/viracopos.jpg<br>> <br>> On the other hand, this airport<br>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3896781 seems to overlap every<br>> internal feature (like grasses): http://cocardl.com.br/pv/galeao.jpg<br>> <br>> Is mkgmap giving different treatments for aeroway=aerodrome as a<br>> closed way and as a relation?<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> mkgmap-dev mailing list<br>> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<br>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev<br></div> </div></body>
</html>