<div dir="ltr">Are you sure they are always paved? At least for Austria quite a lot of them are actually gravel - on the countryside at least. In rural parts they are mostly paved...<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 8 September 2015 at 12:12, GerdP <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com" target="_blank">gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi all,<br>
I think I should add that in Germany we have thousands of these<br>
ways, and I am very sure that most of them are paved.<br>
The reason is that Germany is full of signs like 237 , 241, and 242<br>
(see <a href="http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/</a>)<br>
and that page still recommends to use the tags &quot;highway=path&quot; and<br>
&quot;bicycle=designated&quot; for them. In Germany a cyclist has to use these<br>
ways, so you can be pretty sure that they are paved.<br>
<br>
So, maybe we can add an exception for Germany?<br>
Gerd<br>
<br>
<br>
GerdP wrote<br>
<div><div class="h5">&gt; Hi all,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I just noted that the default style sets the mkgmap:unpaved<br>
&gt; flag for many cycleways, e.g.<br>
&gt; <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276070019" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276070019</a><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I see intensive discussions about wrong use of<br>
&gt; highway=path and/or wrong interpretation of that tag.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; The rule in lines is<br>
&gt; (highway=bridleway | highway=path | highway=track | highway=unsurfaced)<br>
&gt; &amp; surface!=* &amp; tracktype!=* &amp; smoothness!=* &amp; sac_scale!=*<br>
&gt; { add mkgmap:unpaved=1 }<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; My understanding is that highway=track is likely to be unpaved, but<br>
&gt; highway=path doesn&#39;t suggest that, esp. not in combination with<br>
&gt; bicycle=designated.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Does anybody have a better solution?<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Gerd<br>
&gt;<br>
</div></div>&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; mkgmap-dev mailing list<br>
<br>
&gt; mkgmap-dev@.org<br>
<br>
&gt; <a href="http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/default-style-highway-path-means-unpaved-tp5854174p5854203.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/default-style-highway-path-means-unpaved-tp5854174p5854203.html</a><br>
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
mkgmap-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk">mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk</a><br>
<a href="http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org &amp; VeloMap.org<br></div>Floragasse 9/11<br></div>1040 Wien<br></div>Austria - Ã–sterreich</div></div>
</div>