<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Hi Carlos,<br><br>thanks for the feedback. <br>I must confess that I was a bit surprised about the improvement.<br>In other words, I thought that I might have found an error<br>in the existing code, so I started to look closer at the HousenumberGenerator,<br>also because of the addr:place problem.<br><br>@WanMil: Do you have a good explanation for the improvement?<br><br>Gerd<br><br><div>> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:37:07 +0100<br>> From: cdavilam@orangecorreo.es<br>> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<br>> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v2] addr:interpolation<br>> <br>> El 09/12/14 a las 16:38, Gerd Petermann escribió:<br>> > Hi all,<br>> ><br>> > attached is v2.<br>> > It turned out to be quite complicated to interpret the data<br>> > provided with this tag, and I found only few places were this<br>> > helps to provide better data. On the other hand, I see no negative<br>> > effects besides the additional code complexity.<br>> ><br>> > A good place to see how address search is improved is here:<br>> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36787892#map=17/51.88859/-8.57449<br>> ><br>> > With the trunk version, a search for 178 Rosewood lists several numbers,<br>> > e.g. 184, 170, 199 and so on. None is really correct.<br>> > The patched version shows exactly one entry, which is probably very close.<br>> > Same result with other numbers which do not appear as housenumbers.<br>> ><br>> > A patched binary based on r3366 is here:<br>> > |http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/236/mkgmap.jar<br>> ><br>> > |Gerd<br>> ><br>> I tested your patch on a different area than the one you suggest and it <br>> really improves house number search.<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> mkgmap-dev mailing list<br>> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<br>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev<br></div> </div></body>
</html>