<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Hi Minko,<br><br>I tried <br>route=ferry & (motorcar=no | motor_vehicle=no | foot=yes & access=no | foot=yes & vehicle=no) {add mkgmap:ferry=1} [0x1b road_class=0 road_speed=0 resolution 23]<br>route=ferry {add mkgmap:ferry=1} [0x1b road_class=3 road_speed=0 resolution 19]<br><br>but this still doesn't catch this one:<br><a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24222964" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24222964</a><br><br>which doesn't look like a ferry for motor_vehicles, but doesn't say so.<br>I guess this is a matter of missing tagging and not missing rules?<br><br>Gerd<br><br><div>> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:35:00 +0200<br>> From: ligfietser@online.nl<br>> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<br>> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Problematic routing on road_class=3 ferry routes for hikers<br>> <br>> Thanks Gerd,<br>> <br>> I forgot a few other combinations:<br>> access=no & foot=yes<br>> vehicle=no & foot=yes<br>> <br>> Of course if cars AND pedestrians are allowed, routing will still be problematic in hiking mode, but with these rules we can eliminate the problems on foot/bike ferries.<br>> Also note that in bicycle mode this won't be an issue because road_class=3 ways are routable for cyclists.<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> mkgmap-dev mailing list<br>> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<br>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev<br></div> </div></body>
</html>