<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Hi Nick,<br><br>well, 0x11f00 is 256 * 0x11f, so it is not the same, but <br>if I get you right you want mkgmap to interpret all values >= 0x100 and x<br>as if they were written with a 00 at the end.<br>What is the upper bound (x) ?<br><br>See also <br><a href="http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2013q2/017797.html" target="_blank">http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2013q2/017797.html</a><br><br>Gerd<br><br><div><hr id="stopSpelling">Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 08:04:31 -0800<br>From: osm@pinns.co.uk<br>To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<br>Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles<br><br>
Hi Gerd<br>
<br>
0x11f is the same as 0x11f00 - both have been valid expressions in
the past.<br>
<br>
However, the style checker tells me that 11f is invalid.<br>
This applies to I think all extended types , ie it tells me 10A
(without the 00) is invalid.<br>
It accepts 10A00 but not 10A <br>
It accepts 11F00 but not 11F<br>
I agree 10A00 is the more accurate way of defining an extended line
but it might be confusing to flag them as invalid.<br>
<br>
r<br>
<br>
Nick<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="ecxmoz-cite-prefix">On 30/12/2013 15:49, GerdP [via GIS]
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #CCCCCC;padding:0 1em;" cite="mid:DUB112-W46EB190B68EE3248436D2C9ECE0@phx.gbl">
<div dir="ltr">Hi,<br>
<br>
yes, 0x11f00 is recognized as an extended type.<br>
What bug do you mean? <br>
Should mkgmap interpret 0x11f as 0x11f00 <br>
when used in the lines or polygons file?<br>
<br>
Gerd<br>
<br>
<div>> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 02:07:24 -0800
<div class="ecxshrinkable-quote"><br>
> From: <a href="http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=0" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">[hidden
email]</a><br>
> To: <a href="http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">[hidden
email]</a><br>
> Subject: [mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles<br>
> <br>
> Hi<br>
> <br>
> Interesting 'bug' when using check-styles.<br>
> <br>
> It had me foxed as it actually by chance highlighted
lines I didn't use in<br>
> my TYP file.<br>
> <br>
> invalid type 0x11f for POLYLINE<br>
> <br>
> It transpires that when replacing 11f with 11f00 the
type number is<br>
> correctly identified as valid.<br>
> I checked it with several lines, with and without the
zero subtypes.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> --<br>
> View this message in context:
<a class="ecxmoz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157.html</a><br>
> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive
at Nabble.com.<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> mkgmap-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">[hidden
email]</a><br>
> <a class="ecxmoz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
_______________________________________________
<br>
mkgmap-dev mailing list
<br>
<a href="http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">[hidden email]</a>
<br>
<a href="http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev</a>
<br>
<br>
<hr color="#cccccc" noshade="noshade" size="1">
<div style="color:#444;font:12px tahoma,geneva,helvetica,arial,sans-serif;">
<div style="font-weight:bold;">If you reply to this email, your
message will be added to the discussion below:</div>
<a href="http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157p5791203.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157p5791203.html</a>
</div>
<div style="color:#666;font:11px tahoma,geneva,helvetica,arial,sans-serif;line-height:1.5em;">
To unsubscribe from invalid types in check-styles, <a href="http://" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">click
here</a>.<br>
<a href="http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble:email.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble:email.naml-instant_emails%21nabble:email.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble:email.naml" rel="nofollow" style="font:9px serif;" target="_blank">NAML</a> </div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br><hr align="left" width="300">
View this message in context: <a href="http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157p5791212.html" target="_blank">Re: invalid types in check-styles</a><br>
Sent from the <a href="http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html" target="_blank">Mkgmap Development mailing list archive</a> at Nabble.com.<br><br>_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev</div> </div></body>
</html>