<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Hi,<br><br>yes, 0x11f00 is recognized as an extended type.<br>What bug do you mean? <br>Should mkgmap interpret 0x11f as 0x11f00 <br>when used in the lines or polygons file?<br><br>Gerd<br><br><div>> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 02:07:24 -0800<br>> From: osm@pinns.co.uk<br>> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<br>> Subject: [mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles<br>> <br>> Hi<br>> <br>> Interesting 'bug' when using check-styles.<br>> <br>> It had me foxed as it actually by chance highlighted lines I didn't use in<br>> my TYP file.<br>> <br>> invalid type 0x11f for POLYLINE<br>> <br>> It transpires that when replacing 11f with 11f00 the type number is<br>> correctly identified as valid.<br>> I checked it with several lines, with and without the zero subtypes.<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> --<br>> View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157.html<br>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> mkgmap-dev mailing list<br>> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<br>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev<br></div> </div></body>
</html>