logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

From Thomas Morgenstern webmaster at img2ms.de on Tue Feb 6 13:35:55 GMT 2018

Hi Gerd, i have now made a different split, so that 1 tile contains the 
whole isle. In this case it looks good. I assume, that the relation is okay. 
No idea what should be changed in data. Also i have looked before with JOSM 
in the old split and  confirm, that in the left tile the relation also 
exists, but not rendered from mkgmap. I can't judge, if the relation is 
broken or not. Therefore the problem is in mkgmap ? I
thomas

--------------------------------------------------
Von: "Gerd Petermann" <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>
Datum: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 12:15
An: "Thomas Morgenstern" <webmaster at img2ms.de>; "Development list for 
mkgmap" <mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

> Hi Thomas,
>
> I think the problem is that the relation is broken. Splitter writes it to 
> both tiles, but
> mkgmap seems to have problems with it.
> Anyway, the problem is in the data and should be fixed in OSM.
>
> Gerd
>
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von 
> Thomas Morgenstern <webmaster at img2ms.de>
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 12:50
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations
>
> Hi Gerd, i found out, that splitter r590 can not proper handle the 
> relation
> 2.691.138. I can reproduce the problem. It makes no different, if I splitt
> the canary-islands-latest.osm.pbf with the default-option or with my own
> splitt.list. If I move the tileborder by changing the nord-south border,
> also the problem is moved. See picture at
> http://img2ms.de/OSM/ErrorInSplitter-r590.jpg. At the tile-boundary 
> splitter
> creates only for the rightsite tile the polygon for  tag
> boundary=protected_area , respektive leisure=nature_reserve. In the
> leftsite-tile this tags are missing.
> maybee you can have a look at that ?
>
> regards thomas
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> 


More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list