[mkgmap-dev] DEM-file generation from geo-tiff sources ?From franco_bez franco.bez at web.de on Sat Jan 6 22:17:41 GMT 2018
Henning Scholland wrote > Btw. Are these files so much better compared to the viewfinder-hgt files? https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=47.8569&mlon=10.6028#map=15/47.8569/10.6027 In the viewfinder_1 data there is a "ghost-hill" in my area. The hill does not exist in real-life. Oregon Screenshot with the Ghost hill VIEW_1 <http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/file/t339543/VIEW_1_ein_Huegel.bmp> Even in the low-resolution viewfinder_3 data there is no hill - correct. Oregon Screenshot VIEW_3 <http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/file/t339543/VIEW_3_kein_Huegel.bmp> The Copernicus data also does not have the "ghost-hill", but also the high resolution. So, IMHO the Copernicus data has a better quality compared to the viewfinder data. -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] DEM-file generation from geo-tiff sources ?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] DEM and "holes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list