[mkgmap-dev] mkgmap:set_unconnected_type differentiate between connected on both sides or on one side only

Thu Sep 21 10:10:44 BST 2017

Somthing seems to be wrong with the patch:

java.lang.NullPointerException
        at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.StyledConverter.findUnconnectedRoads(StyledConverter.java:1970)
        at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.StyledConverter.end(StyledConverter.java:605)
        at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.ElementSaver.convert(ElementSaver.java:243)
        at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.load(OsmMapDataSource.java:157)
        at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.loadFromFile(MapMaker.java:154)
        at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.makeMap(MapMaker.java:52)
        at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:263)
        at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:259)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown
Source)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Could Not Find C:\OpenMTBMap\maps\ovm_6431*.img

On 19 September 2017 at 15:53, Gerd Petermann <
gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Attached is v2 of the patch. It implements the removal of overlay lines
> when
> mkgmap:set_unconnected_type=none or mkgmap:set_semi_connected_type=none
> was
> found.
>
> I am still not sure what should be done if the tag has a value that gives
> another type instead of none.
> Assume your style uses
> highway=service & service=driveway {set
> mkgmap:set_semi_connected_type=0x10806}
> highway=service [0x07 road_class=0 road_speed=2 resolution 22 continue]
> highway=service & oneway=yes [0x10106 resolution 24]
>
> What would you expect for a semi connected way?
> We have 2 lines, the first is changed from 0x07 to 0x10806. It would not
> make much sense to change also the 2nd from 0x10106  to 0x10806.
> So, for now only the value none has an effect for the overlay line(s).
>
> semi_con-v2.patch
> <http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/file/t318326/semi_con-v2.patch>
>
> Gerd
>
>
> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
> > That sounds good
> >
> > On Sep 19, 2017 11:23 AM, "Gerd Petermann" <
>
> > gpetermann_muenchen@
>
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Felix,
> >>
> >> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
> >> > Well I would like it to apply to non routable lines too - if continue
> >> > with_actions is used - basically just treat routable and non routable
> >> > lines
> >> > the same (the initial check should only look at routable lines though
> I
> >> > guess).
> >>
> >> OK, I think I can change the code so that it stores the information
> >> whether
> >> or not a road
> >> is connected (or "semi-connected") once for each OSM way that is at
> least
> >> added once as a road.
> >> In a further step mkgmap would check each line for the existence of the
> >> mkgmap:set_unconnected_type tag and check if the corresponding OSM way
> is
> >> connected or not.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>

-- 
Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org
Schusterbergweg 32/8
6020 Innsbruck
Austria - Österreich
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20170921/09559093/attachment.html>