[mkgmap-dev] feedback for patch admin_centre-v1.patch ?

Sat May 9 08:46:36 BST 2015

Hi Anor,

okay. There may also be different tags on the node and on the relation so that
your style produces two different POI (types) for the same location.
E.g. the relation may contain population=4920 and the node population=5012.
With the default style this would produce two different POI.
I see no simple way to handle that, and I think it should be fixed in OSM then.

Gerd

From: anorcarlos at hotmail.com
To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 13:35:50 -0300
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] feedback for patch admin_centre-v1.patch ?

thank Gerd,
in Brazil identified that the solution removed most POI created by the add-poi-to-area where there is a admin_centre included in the boundary relation. Some insist on staying but we believe that other polygons are formatted incorrectly creating the POI with same name as the city within the area.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Anor C. A. de Souza                                                              Concórdia SC   

From: gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com
To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 09:44:04 +0200
Subject: [mkgmap-dev] feedback for patch admin_centre-v1.patch ?

Hi all,

not sure if anybody noticed this post:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Fw-Help-tp5843021p5843485.html

I wrote that I'll commit it on sunday if I hear no complains,
but I would prefer to hear some positive feedback first ;-)

Gerd

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev 		 	   		  

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20150509/7824f5c1/attachment-0001.html>