logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types.

From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Sun May 11 09:37:33 BST 2014

Hi Minko,


that sounds like the original list was not so bad:
        //return type >= 0x01 && type <= 0x13 || type == 0x1a || type == 0x1b || type == 0x16;
what about 0x16, 0x1a and 0x1b ?

0xa is in the range 0x01 - 0x13. Is this really an exception? And is it the only one?

Gerd

> Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 10:29:21 +0200
> From: ligfietser at online.nl
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types.
> 
> Hi Gerd
>  
> > If I got that right, we should
> > 1) warn when the style file lines uses types 0x02 - 0x09 without road
> > class/speed if -check-styles is used
> >
> > 2) warn if a line is added multiple times, once with type between 0x01
> > and 0x3f and road class/speed,
> > once with type 0x02 - 0x09 and without road class/speed.
> > 
> > I've implemented that with r3267.
> > 
> > Gerd
> 
> 
> I also found errors with 0x01, 0x10, 0x13 but not 0x18 or 0xa
> 
> So better warn with 0x01-0x13;0x16 without road class/speed
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20140511/f0926ee5/attachment.html>


More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list