logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types.

From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Fri May 9 13:03:39 BST 2014

Hi Minko,

okay, got it. So maybe we have to separate the "well known" routable types
0x01 -0x13 , 0x1a, 0x1b, 0x16 from others which are also routable?

Gerd


ligfietser wrote
> Hi Gerd,
> 
> Let me give an example when it goes wrong then:
> highway=unclassified  [0x06 road_class=3 road_speed=2 resolution 23 
> continue with_actions]
> bicycleroute=yes [0x02 road_class=4 road_speed=3 resolution 22 continue]
> 
> I have to use continue because this rule must continue for
> highway=pedestrian areas which are also handled in the polygons style.
> 
> If I remove the road parameters from the second line routing breaks:
> bicycleroute=yes [0x02 resolution 22 continue]
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list

> mkgmap-dev at .org

> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev





--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Commit-r3259-remove-most-checks-regarding-routable-non-routable-types-tp5805376p5805732.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list