[mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles

Mon Dec 30 16:29:52 GMT 2013

Hi Gerd

No , its only the style checker that throws up the anomaly.

I might have missed something about mkgmap requiring 00 subtypes ? 
although I have not encountered
any problems leaving them out for extended types

The highest subtype is 1F and the highest type for lines/polylines, I 
think, &1FF making 1FF1F the  highest number.

On 30/12/2013 17:17, GerdP [via GIS] wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> well, 0x11f00 is 256 * 0x11f, so it is not the same, but
> if I get you right you want mkgmap to interpret all values >= 0x100 and x
> as if they were written with a 00 at the end.
> What is the upper bound (x) ?
>
> See also
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2013q2/017797.html
>
> Gerd
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 08:04:31 -0800
> From: [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791215&i=0>
> To: [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791215&i=1>
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles
>
> Hi Gerd
>
> 0x11f is the same as 0x11f00 - both have been valid expressions in the 
> past.
>
> However, the style checker tells me that 11f is invalid.
> This applies to I think all extended types , ie it tells me 10A 
> (without the 00) is invalid.
> It accepts 10A00 but not 10A
> It accepts 11F00 but not 11F
> I agree 10A00 is the more accurate way of defining an extended line 
> but it might be confusing to flag them as invalid.
>
> r
>
> Nick
>
>
> On 30/12/2013 15:49, GerdP [via GIS] wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     yes, 0x11f00 is recognized as an extended type.
>     What bug do you mean?
>     Should mkgmap interpret 0x11f as 0x11f00
>     when used in the lines or polygons file?
>
>     Gerd
>
>     > Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 02:07:24 -0800
>
>     > From: [hidden email]
>     <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=0>
>     > To: [hidden email]
>     <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=1>
>     > Subject: [mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles
>     >
>     > Hi
>     >
>     > Interesting 'bug' when using check-styles.
>     >
>     > It had me foxed as it actually by chance highlighted lines I
>     didn't use in
>     > my TYP file.
>     >
>     > invalid type 0x11f for POLYLINE
>     >
>     > It transpires that when replacing 11f with 11f00 the type number is
>     > correctly identified as valid.
>     > I checked it with several lines, with and without the zero subtypes.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > View this message in context:
>     http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157.html
>     > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > mkgmap-dev mailing list
>     > [hidden email]
>     <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=2>
>     > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     mkgmap-dev mailing list
>     [hidden email]
>     <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=3>
>     http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>     discussion below:
>     http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157p5791203.html
>
>     To unsubscribe from invalid types in check-styles, click here
>     <http://>.
>     NAML
>     <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble:email.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble:email.naml-instant_emails%21nabble:email.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble:email.naml>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> View this message in context: Re: invalid types in check-styles 
> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157p5791212.html>
> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive 
> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at 
> Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing 
> list [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791215&i=2> 
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791215&i=3>
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the 
> discussion below:
> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157p5791215.html 
>
> To unsubscribe from invalid types in check-styles, click here 
> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=5791157&code=b3NtQHBpbm5zLmNvLnVrfDU3OTExNTd8MTM1NTM3MTE1MQ==>.
> NAML 
> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> 
>

--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157p5791217.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20131230/4f6204de/attachment-0001.html>