[mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles

Mon Dec 30 16:16:48 GMT 2013

Hi Nick,

well, 0x11f00 is 256 * 0x11f, so it is not the same, but  
if I get you right you want mkgmap to interpret all values >= 0x100 and x
as if they were written with a 00 at the end.
What is the upper bound (x) ?

See also 
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2013q2/017797.html

Gerd

Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 08:04:31 -0800
From: osm at pinns.co.uk
To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles

    Hi Gerd

    0x11f is the same as 0x11f00 - both have been valid expressions in
    the past.

    However, the style checker tells me that 11f is invalid.

    This applies to I think all extended types , ie it tells me 10A
    (without the 00) is invalid.

    It accepts 10A00 but not 10A 

    It accepts 11F00 but not 11F

    I agree 10A00 is the more accurate way of defining an extended line
    but it might be confusing to flag them as invalid.

    r

    Nick

    On 30/12/2013 15:49, GerdP [via GIS]
      wrote:

      Hi,

        yes, 0x11f00 is recognized as an extended type.

        What bug do you mean? 

        Should mkgmap interpret 0x11f as 0x11f00 

        when used in the lines or polygons file?

        Gerd

        > Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 02:07:24 -0800

            > From: [hidden
              email]

            > To: [hidden
              email]

            > Subject: [mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles

            > 

            > Hi

            > 

            > Interesting 'bug' when using check-styles.

            > 

            > It had me foxed as it actually by chance highlighted
            lines I didn't use in

            > my TYP file.

            > 

            > invalid type 0x11f for POLYLINE

            > 

            > It transpires that when replacing 11f with 11f00 the
            type number is

            > correctly identified as valid.

            > I checked it with several lines, with and without the
            zero subtypes.

            > 

            > 

            > 

            > 

            > 

            > --

            > View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157.html

            > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive
            at Nabble.com.

            > _______________________________________________

            > mkgmap-dev mailing list

            > [hidden
              email]

            > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

      _______________________________________________

      mkgmap-dev mailing list

      [hidden email]

      http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

        If you reply to this email, your
          message will be added to the discussion below:
        http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157p5791203.html

        To unsubscribe from invalid types in check-styles, click
          here.

        NAML 

View this message in context: Re: invalid types in check-styles

Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20131230/eceb966e/attachment.html>