logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] Overview2 branch - options file typo?

From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Mon May 6 18:46:18 BST 2013

Hi Felix,

yes, it was a typo. I tested with different values. I have no preference and
no experience, 
so I'd be happy to hear proposals.

Gerd


Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
> Is there a typo in the options file?
> "overview-levels = 5:16 6:18 "
> 
> shouldn't that be 5:16 6:14 ???
> I think that if the numbering continues, further levels should be 
> decreasing resolution. So if 18 and 16 should be used in the overview 
> map (but why have 17 then as normal map resolution??):
> it should read "5:18 6:16" -- However I thought overlapping resolutions 
> is not good form (actually dunno what happens).
> 
> 
> IMHO 5:16 6:14 is quite good as conservative value. (continent maps). 
> Maybe we should even move to 4:17 5:16 6:14 in the overview map (and 0-3 
> in the normal map)...
> 
> 
> As for the routable basemap on newer garmin GPS. Maybe we could create a 
> non routable mkgmap created basemap and recommend people to use it
> instead?
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list

> mkgmap-dev at .org

> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev





--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759856.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list