logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] Address include in polygons style file superfluous?

From WanMil wmgcnfg at web.de on Sun Mar 10 14:17:59 GMT 2013

Hi Gerd,

thanks for the reminder. I have commited it.

If anybody detects a difference please let me know.

WanMil

> Hi WanMil,
>
> did you ever continue on this?
> I found this comment in MapBuilder.java
> // shapes do not have address information
>
> Gerd
>
>
> WanMil wrote
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have started writing some pages for the new mkgmap documentation about
>> address search. This made me thinking if the address include is required
>> for the polygons style file. Is it possible to see the address
>> information of a polygon in a Garmin map (or better a mkgmap created map)?
>>
>> If the answer is no we could remove the include from the polygons style
>> file which saves some memory and some processing steps. Additionally we
>> could remove the processing of polygons from the LocationHook.
>>
>> The only thing that need to be changed is the -add-pois-to-areas option.
>> The POIs created by this option must be worked out by the LocationHook
>> because the polygons do not contain the address info any more. But I
>> think this would be easy.
>>
>> Any comments?
>>
>> WanMil
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>
>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>
>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Address-include-in-polygons-style-file-superfluous-tp5744939p5752539.html
> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>



More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list