logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] version numbers

From Felix Hartmann extremecarver at gmail.com on Thu Nov 8 10:43:22 GMT 2012

     Map created with mkgmap-runknown


this is where it would be, had I compiled mkgmap with Linux....
On 08.11.2012 11:41, n Willink wrote:
> Hi Felix
> Forgive me if I'm a bit slow but
> I can see the copyright and mapnumber,65310014 etc but where is the 
> actual reference to the mkgmap's version number?
> Was it say compiled using 2179,2370 or non of these?
> Even with the latest version of gmaptool I can't see it .
> *From:* [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734857&i=0>
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 10:22 AM
> *To:* [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734857&i=1>
> *Subject:* Re: version numbers
> If you use gmaptool, and click on details, then you would see it...
>
> e.g. a sample output (makes me remember to change the sourcecode 
> attribution from ccbysa to odbl..., something that should be done in 
> trunk too...):
> File:        D:/Garmin/openmtbmap/us-northeast/65310014.img, length 
> 3437056
> Header:       06.11.2012 17:44:37, DSKIMG, XOR 00, V 0.00, Ms 0
> Mapset:       US-Troy
> fat:        400h - 600h - 4600h, block 512
> maps:        1, sub-files 5
>
> Sub-file         fat     length
> 65310014 RGN    600h   1692620
> 65310014 TRE   2200h      7820
>     map 3e48d3e (65310014)
>     date 06.11.2012 17:44:39
>     priority 31, parameters 1 4 23 0
>     levels [13,14,16,18,19,20,21,22,24], zoom [88,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0]
>     N: 43.593750, S: 42.714844, W: -73.696289, E: -72.817383
>     OpenStreetMap and contributors
> www.openstreetmap.org
>     Map data licenced under odbl
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
>     Map created with mkgmap-runknown
>    Program released under the GPL
> 65310014 LBL   2400h    210838
>     CP 1252, Western European Sort
> 65310014 NET   2800h    389486
> 65310014 NOD   3000h   1117500
>
> Map              length s-f  CP    prio  PID   FID  name
> 65310014 MPC   3418264  5  1252   31
>
>
>
> End.
> On 08.11.2012 11:04, n Willink wrote:
>> Thanks Gerd
>> I've not seen that I'm afraid even in the lbl
>> *From:* <A 
>> href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&amp;node=5734847&amp;i=0" 
>> rel=nofollow target=_top link="external" 
>> moz-do-not-send="true">[hidden email]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:53 AM
>> *To:* <A 
>> href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&amp;node=5734847&amp;i=1" 
>> rel=nofollow target=_top link="external" 
>> moz-do-not-send="true">[hidden email]
>> *Subject:* Re: version numbers
>> Maybe you find "Map created with mkgmap-svn" or "Map created with 
>> mkgmap-unknown". I think that happened when building from source on a 
>> windows machine, don't know it that is fixed now.
>>
>> Gerd
>>
>>     n Willink wrote
>>     Thanks for your advise.
>>
>>     I'm looking at the raw data using my own software to parse the
>>     TRE ,RGN,LBL NOD MDR etc of an img
>>
>>     As far as I can tell there is no reference to mkgmaps's version
>>     number , ie 2179,2370 in the img file itself.
>>
>>     By difference I meant looking at the contents/order of  maplevels
>>     & subfiles in TRE or the POIS found in MDR4 using the same osm
>>     but different versions of mkgmap
>>
>>     Currently, I'm encountering some very strange & alarming
>>     behaviour when the gpx of a route disappears when zooming in
>>     .This only happens when I don't need splitter.
>>     I've never encounted the priority of an img override that of an IMG
>>
>>     From: GerdP [via GIS]
>>     Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:18 AM
>>     To: n Willink
>>     Subject: Re: version numbers
>>
>>     >
>>
>>     > There is another issue which perhaps betrays mkgmaps modesty
>>     but at present
>>     > there is no way of telling which version has been used to
>>     create a gmapsupp
>>     > or img - it could be included in the copyright section?
>>
>>     Hmm, you should find the string Map created with mkgmap-rxxxx in
>>     the *.img file.
>>     Don't you?
>>
>>     >
>>     > I'm currently trying to compare imgs created by different
>>     versions of mkgmap
>>     > and analyse what causes their behaviour to be so different.
>>
>>     What tool do you use to compare two img files? If you just
>>     compare the files, you
>>     will see a lot of differences even if you use the same mkgmap and
>>     the same input.
>>     My identical_output_v2.patch might help, but one has to adapt it
>>     to current mkgmap releases.
>>     See also
>>     http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Small-holes-in-boundary-coverage-tp5569161p5624523.html
>>
>>     Ciao,
>>     Gerd
>>
>>
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > --
>>     > View this message in context:
>>     http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734827.html
>>     > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
>>     Nabble.com.
>>     > _______________________________________________
>>     > mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>     > [hidden email]
>>     > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>     [hidden email]
>>     http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>
>>
>>     --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>     If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>>     discussion below:
>>     http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734831.html
>>
>>     To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email <A
>>     href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&amp;node=5734845&amp;i=0"
>>     rel=nofollow target=_top link="external">[hidden email]
>>     To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here.
>>     NAML
>>     No virus found in this message.
>>     Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>     Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date:
>>     11/07/12
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the 
>> discussion below:
>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734845.html
>> To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email <A 
>> href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&amp;node=5734847&amp;i=2" 
>> rel=nofollow target=_top link="external" 
>> moz-do-not-send="true">[hidden email]
>> To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, <A 
>> href="wlmailhtml:{970563C7-28FA-4C2E-B163-58995EF0D074}mid://00000048/" 
>> rel=nofollow target=_top link="external" moz-do-not-send="true">click 
>> here.
>> NAML 
>> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> 
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> View this message in context: Re: version numbers 
>> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734847.html>
>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive 
>> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at 
>> Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> <A href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&amp;node=5734853&amp;i=0" rel=nofollow target=_top link="external">[hidden email]
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> -- 
> keep on biking and discovering new trails
>
> Felix
> openmtbmap.org &www.velomap.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> <A 
> href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&amp;node=5734853&amp;i=1" 
> rel=nofollow target=_top link="external">[hidden email]
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the 
> discussion below:
> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734853.html
> To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email [hidden email] 
> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734857&i=2>
> To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here.
> NAML 
> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> 
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> View this message in context: Re: version numbers 
> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734857.html>
> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive 
> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at 
> Nabble.com.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

-- 
keep on biking and discovering new trails

Felix
openmtbmap.org & www.velomap.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20121108/e260793c/attachment.html 


More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list