[mkgmap-dev] Bug in LocationHook?From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Mon Jan 9 09:25:50 GMT 2012
Hi Marko, I had the same idea while I was optimizing splitter, but I wanted to achive better throughput. I don't know if it also would allow better quality. Regaring the performance of the LocationHook I see no advantage doing this. I think WanMil introduced the precompiled bounds just because the normal input doesn't contain enough information (unclosed boundaries). Ciao, Gerd Marko Mäkelä wrote > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:36:13PM +0100, WanMil wrote: >>I broadly remember that splitter uses a 2^n raster (?). Maybe it's >>beneficial to change the boundary raster to the splitter raster? > > Would it make any sense to combine splitter and mkgmap to a single > process? I guess that splitter would still have to write output to disk > in many cases, but in others it could directly pipe the tiles to the > mkgmap code. Would it help if multipolygons and location info were > processed directly in splitter? > > Marko > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at .org > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Bug-in-LocationHook-tp7157897p7167257.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Bug in LocationHook?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Bug in LocationHook?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list