logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] Bug in LocationHook?

From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Mon Jan 9 09:25:50 GMT 2012

Hi Marko,

I had the same idea while I was optimizing splitter, but I wanted to achive
better throughput.
I don't know if it also would allow better quality.
Regaring the performance of the LocationHook I see no advantage doing this.
I think WanMil introduced the precompiled bounds just because the normal
input doesn't contain enough information (unclosed boundaries). 


Marko Mäkelä wrote
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:36:13PM +0100, WanMil wrote:
>>I broadly remember that splitter uses a 2^n raster (?). Maybe it's 
>>beneficial to change the boundary raster to the splitter raster?
> Would it make any sense to combine splitter and mkgmap to a single 
> process? I guess that splitter would still have to write output to disk 
> in many cases, but in others it could directly pipe the tiles to the 
> mkgmap code. Would it help if multipolygons and location info were 
> processed directly in splitter?
> 	Marko
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at .org
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Bug-in-LocationHook-tp7157897p7167257.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list