[mkgmap-dev] LOCATOR: doubt about "contains no name tag" messagesFrom Carlos Dávila cdavilam at orangecorreo.es on Thu Mar 24 08:35:10 GMT 2011
El 23/03/11 21:06, WanMil escribió: >> Processing spain.osm.pbf from Geofabrik I get several "contains no name >> tag" messages that point to ways tagged in the form: >> admin_level=8 >> boundary=administrative >> It's true they don't have a tag name, but they belong to relations with >> the same tags + a name and the relation is fully within the tile, so >> it's supposed they should get the name from the relation. Additionally, >> there are thousands of ways in Spain tagged in the same way (all >> administrative boundaries were imported that way) that don't trigger the >> same warning. >> As an example you can have a look at way 45338454. It's about 2 km away >> from the tile border. >> > Carlos, > > I wasn't able to reproduce your problem probably due to different input > data or different splitter settings. Geofabrik seems to be down at the > moment so no real chance to get the same input data. > > If way 45338454 is only 2 km away from the tile border than it might be > possible that it is contained in two tiles due to the splitter overlap. > Please check if the warning message applies to the tile in which the way > and the relation is contained completely. > No, it applies to the adjacent tile. > Anyhow I have synchronized changes from the trunk to the locator branch. > Please try again with these changes. At least it should reduce the > number of such warning messages. > I'm afraid I got exactly the same warnings after recompiling with the new changes.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] LOCATOR: doubt about "contains no name tag" messages
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] LOCATOR: doubt about "contains no name tag" messages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list