[mkgmap-dev] Different routing results using osm vs osm.pbfFrom Scott Crosby scrosby at cs.rice.edu on Tue Oct 19 22:22:18 BST 2010
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Steve Ratcliffe <steve at parabola.me.uk>wrote: > > > Should the pbf format only be used as input for the splitter? > > Or is the splitter not needed anymore as we move onto osm.pbf?? > > Well mkgmap can now read .pbf, but it doesn't do any splitting, so if > the file is large enough you still need to split it. Splitter will have > to produce .pbf output (which it doesn't yet?) for the mkgmap support to > be particularly useful. > There's a branch in the splitter repository that supports reading pbf files, along with significant improvements in scalability and performance, but it still generates *.osm.gz files for output. Scott -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20101019/c6684643/attachment.html
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Different routing results using osm vs osm.pbf
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] User-defined PBF preprocessing in splitter?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list