logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] Bicycle routing improvements (reverting breakage from r1431)

From Carlos Dávila cdavilam at orangecorreo.es on Tue Aug 10 16:12:43 BST 2010

El 10/08/10 15:12, Marko Mäkelä escribió:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 02:37:42PM +0200, Valentijn Sessink wrote:
>> Marko Mäkelä schreef:
>>> I am planning to remove the { add bicycle=no; add foot=no } from
>>> highway=trunk and to restore non-bicycle paths to road_speed=0.
>> I'd suggest you don't. I do not know why bicycle routing differs.
>> Adding random patches to my random reports won't help.
> It is not totally random. Someone just yelled that defaulting bicycle=no
> on highway=trunk is not right, and I cannot disagree with that. If there
> is no traffic sign that prohibits bicycles and pedestrians, then they
> are allowed. And I haven't seen such traffic signs in Finland, except in
> some places when there is a cycleway next to the highway=trunk.
Just to add information from some other place, in Spain trunk roads are 
allowed for bicycles and pedestrians; only motorways are forbidden for 
them. So +1 to remove the { add bicycle=no; add foot=no } from me too.

More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list