[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] - extend --replace-short-arcs option to take min arc lengthFrom Felix Hartmann extremecarver at googlemail.com on Sat Jun 6 16:28:51 BST 2009
What about deleting the following lines, what is the reason?
"ferry".equals(currentWay.getTag("route")))) {
AND
long cyclwayId = currentWay.getId() + CYCLWAY_ID_OFFSET;
Will enabling the --make-opposite-cycleways now overwrite the underlying
road?
Mark Burton wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
>
>> I've experienced the same problem: a short arc disappered in Rome (I'm still looking for it...). And the routing gets broken. Did you understand why those short arcs (with no collapsing end nodes) get deleted?
>>
>
> Bug found, fix committed.
>
> The min arc length can still be specified with --remove-short-arcs (note
> correct name!) but it shouldn't be needed any more.
>
> Zero length arcs must still be removed so you do need to specify
> --remove-short-arcs (but without the min length). Once this has proven
> to be trustworthy, we could think about making the zero length arc
> removal the default behaviour when routing is enabled.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20090606/e16d53ea/attachment.html
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list |