[mkgmap-dev] Re: [PATCH v1] Experimental support for multi-threading

Sat May 9 17:28:11 BST 2009

Hi Toby,

> I didn't get this exception prior to applying the patch:
> 
> /--------
> | Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalStateException: Offset not known yet.
> |         at uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.lbl.POIRecord.getOffset(POIRecord.java:377)
> |         at uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.trergn.Point.write(Point.java:61)
> |         at uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.trergn.RGNFile.addMapObject(RGNFile.java:96)
> |         at uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.map.Map.addMapObject(Map.java:237)
> |         at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.MapBuilder.processPoints(MapBuilder.java:817)
> |         at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.MapBuilder.makeSubdivision(MapBuilder.java:697)
> |         at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.MapBuilder.makeMapAreas(MapBuilder.java:633)
> |         at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.MapBuilder.makeMap(MapBuilder.java:178)
> |         at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.makeMap(MapMaker.java:90)
> |         at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.makeMap(MapMaker.java:56)
> |         at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.processFilename(Main.java:163)
> |         at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.CommandArgs$Filename.processArg(CommandArgs.java:340)
> |         at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.CommandArgs.readArgs(CommandArgs.java:119)
> |         at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.main(Main.java:98)
> \--------
> 
> Could that be caused by the parallelisation?

Absolutely!

I have weeded a few similar bugs out but, obviously, some are still
lurking and are not being triggered by my test maps.

I shall investigate.

Cheers,

Mark

PS - if any other diagnostic messages appeared before the exception,
please post them here.