[mkgmap-dev] Performance of mkgmap.jar and splitter.jar

Sat Apr 4 11:17:01 BST 2009

Will do. Until rev 984 performance is good (o.k got a bit slower, but 
that's o.k.), 988 got intolerable and 991 seems to need twice as much 
time as 988. Im still waiting for 991 to run through and then test on 
with -agentlib. I will continue testing and update you on the results in 
a few hours.

Mark Burton wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
>   
>> I think during the last weeks the increased feature set of mkgmap is 
>> really nice, not so nice is the performance though.....
>> I made some tests - see below. I think with the current versions 
>> performance really has gone by the wayside. It takes 4times as long 
>> against austria.osm compared to rev 937.
>>     
>
> Please add the following to your java options and post the resulting
> java.hprof.txt file to the list or to me directly. Then we will know
> where the time is going.
>
> -agentlib:hprof=cpu=samples,depth=20
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20090404/d1bf1ff5/attachment.html 